57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Anzahl der Tests
18
14
4
3
Optimale Position
#1
#1
#2
#4
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
3.6
3.3
4.3
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
47
194
40
99

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Preis-Wert
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen