57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Turanza 6 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Turanza 6
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Anzahl der Tests
18
15
4
4
5
Optimale Position
#1
#2
#3
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
6.1
12.0
3.3
2.8
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
47
229
111
40
139

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich