57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Anzahl der Tests
18
6
4
1
24
Optimale Position
#1
#3
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
4.7
3.3
1.0
2.7
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
47
146
40
66
151

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Preis-Wert
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen