57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
Hankook
Ventus Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
18
21
5
4
1
Optimale Position
#1
#2
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
11.9
2.8
3.3
1.0
Neuester Test
2024
2024
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
47
165
139
40
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Preis-Wert
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen