57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Michelin
Primacy 5
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
18
16
4
4
5
1
Optimale Position
#1
#3
#2
#3
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
5.5
3.3
12.0
4.8
1.0
Neuester Test
2024
2023
2026
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
47
153
40
111
158
66

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
100%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich