57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.AT

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook ION Evo

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Goodyear Efficient Grip PerformancePremium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance

3.8
R14 – R20
Michelin CrossClimate 2Premium
MichelinMichelin

CrossClimate 2

9.1
R15 – R21
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
18
16
24
3
1
Optimale Position
#1
#3
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
5.5
2.7
3.7
1.0
Neuester Test
2024
2023
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
47
153
151
36
66

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
62%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
62%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Preis-Wert
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Beste -Reifen für ElektrofahrzeugeBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
VS
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71
VS
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125

Auch vergleichen

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcorunGoodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs BFGoodrich AdvantageGoodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Continental UltraContactGoodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Dunlop Sport BluResponseGoodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Cooper ZEON CS8Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen