58 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Anzahl der Tests
18
1
4
4
7
Optimale Position
#1
#1
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
1.0
3.8
3.3
2.3
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
47
66
36
40
139

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
63%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
68%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
63%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
61%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
58%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
63%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
63%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
64%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
62%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
63%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
65%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
61%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
63%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
54%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook ION Evo
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.