57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Continental UltraContact gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Continental
UltraContact
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
16
1
4
13
3
4
Optimale Position
#3
#7
#2
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
5.5
7.0
3.3
4.3
3.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2023
2023
2026
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
153
87
40
123
36
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Continental UltraContact
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Continental UltraContact
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Continental UltraContact
58%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Continental UltraContact
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Continental UltraContact
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Continental UltraContact
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Continental UltraContact
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Continental UltraContact
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Continental UltraContact
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Continental UltraContact
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen