57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.AT

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Goodyear Efficient Grip PerformancePremium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance

3.8
R14 – R20
Firestone Roadhawk 2Obere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk 2

8.0
R16 – R22
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.7
R16 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
16
6
3
4
28
Optimale Position
#3
#3
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
5.5
4.7
3.7
3.3
2.3
Neuester Test
2023
2026
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
153
146
36
40
67

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Preis-Wert
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Best tyres for evsBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Auch vergleichen

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Continental UltraContactGoodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Dunlop Sport BluResponseGoodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Cooper ZEON CS8Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs BFGoodrich AdvantageFirestone Roadhawk 2 vs Uniroyal RainSport 5Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen