57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.AT

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Goodyear Efficient Grip PerformancePremium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance

3.8
R14 – R20
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Kumho Ecsta HS52Obere-Mittelklasse
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
16
18
10
4
4
1
Optimale Position
#3
#1
#2
#3
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
5.5
6.1
6.0
12.0
3.3
1.0
Neuester Test
2023
2024
2026
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
153
47
109
111
40
66
Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Reifen für ElektroautosBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Auch vergleichen

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Continental UltraContactGoodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Dunlop Sport BluResponseGoodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Cooper ZEON CS8Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Pirelli Cinturato P7Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliMichelinHankookGoodyearNokianFalkenKumhoVredesteinContinentalNexenMaxxisBridgestone

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen