57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
16
18
10
4
1
Optimale Position
#3
#1
#2
#3
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
5.5
6.1
6.0
12.0
1.0
Neuester Test
2023
2024
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
153
47
109
111
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen