57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Pirelli P Zero Winter 2

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Pirelli
P Zero Winter 2
Anzahl der Tests
16
18
4
4
1
2
Optimale Position
#3
#1
#3
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
5.5
6.1
12.0
3.3
1.0
2.0
Neuester Test
2023
2024
2025
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
153
47
111
40
66
48

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
83%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
59%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
13%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
87%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
88%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
79%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
71%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich