57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Anzahl der Tests
16
4
4
24
5
Optimale Position
#3
#2
#3
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
5.5
3.3
12.0
2.7
2.8
Neuester Test
2023
2026
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
153
40
111
302
139

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich