57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Continental SportContact 7 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
SportContact 7
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
16
4
16
3
4
Optimale Position
#3
#3
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
5.5
12.0
1.2
3.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2023
2025
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
153
111
124
36
40

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Continental SportContact 7
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental SportContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental SportContact 7
95%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Continental SportContact 7
87%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Continental SportContact 7
80%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental SportContact 7
91%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental SportContact 7
94%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Continental SportContact 7
96%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Continental SportContact 7
86%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Continental SportContact 7
85%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Continental SportContact 7
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Continental SportContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Continental SportContact 7
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental SportContact 7
77%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental SportContact 7
77%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich