58 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Cargo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
16
18
5
4
1
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#3
#1
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
2.0
3.3
5.5
6.1
2.2
3.8
1.0
Neuester Test
2019
2026
2023
2024
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
43
40
153
47
63
36
66

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
67%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Innengeräusche
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.