59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Compact
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Pirelli
Cinturato (C3)
Anzahl der Tests
1
10
18
4
4
7
Optimale Position
#10
#2
#1
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
10.0
6.0
6.1
3.3
3.8
2.7
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2024
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
42
109
47
40
36
31

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
88%
Aquaplaning - quer
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
56%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
84%
Nassbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
93%
Kreisbahn nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
92%
Handling - nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
47%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
94%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
84%
Außengeräusch
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
74%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
90%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
82%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
92%
Trockenbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
94%
Handling - trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
87%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
75%
Rollwiderstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
74%
Kilometerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
77%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact Kumho Ecsta HS52 Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Falken e.Ziex Pirelli Cinturato (C3) %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.