57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Michelin Primacy 5

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Michelin
Primacy 5
Anzahl der Tests
1
21
4
18
3
5
Optimale Position
#5
#2
#2
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
5.0
11.9
3.3
6.1
3.7
4.8
Neuester Test
2024
2024
2026
2024
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
165
40
47
36
158

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Seitenführung
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
98%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
95%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen