57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
16
13
3
1
Optimale Position
#5
#2
#3
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
5.0
3.3
5.5
4.3
3.7
1.0
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2023
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
153
123
36
66

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
98%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen