57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Continental WinterContact TS 870 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
17
4
23
Optimale Position
#5
#3
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
5.0
12.0
1.7
3.3
3.3
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
111
80
40
176

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
98%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
95%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen