57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental WinterContact TS 870 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
4
17
23
Optimale Position
#5
#3
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
5.0
12.0
3.3
1.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2024
2025
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
111
40
80
176

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
98%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
95%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
74%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen