57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Cooper Zeon CS8

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Cooper
Zeon CS8
Anzahl der Tests
4
14
18
14
Optimale Position
#2
#8
#1
#9
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
13.4
6.1
19.7
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2024
2024
Verfügbare Größen
40
153
47
147

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Cooper Zeon CS8
78%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Cooper Zeon CS8
75%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Cooper Zeon CS8
86%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Cooper Zeon CS8
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Cooper Zeon CS8
79%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Cooper Zeon CS8
76%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Cooper Zeon CS8
72%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Cooper Zeon CS8
59%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Cooper Zeon CS8
89%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Cooper Zeon CS8
75%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Cooper Zeon CS8
80%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Cooper Zeon CS8
80%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Cooper Zeon CS8
80%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Cooper Zeon CS8
52%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Cooper Zeon CS8
49%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Cooper Zeon CS8
63%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich