Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Premium

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Roadhawk

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Anzahl der Tests

4

21

18

3

1

5

Optimale Position

#2

#1

#2

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

3.3

11.9

6.1

3.7

1.0

2.2

Neuester Test

2026

2024

2025

Verfügbare Größen

40

165

47

36

66

63

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Nassbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Handling - nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Aquaplaning - längs

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Aquaplaning - quer

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Kreisbahn nass

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Seitenführung

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Firestone Roadhawk

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Trockenbremsen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Handling - trocken

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Komfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Außengeräusch

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Komfort

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Innengeräusche

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

100%

Kosten

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Rollwiderstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Kilometerstand

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Beste -Reifen für Elektrofahrzeuge Beste Trockenhandling reifen Beste Regenreifen Reifen mit bestem Handling Die Leisesten reifen Die günstigsten reifen Beste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

VS

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71

Auch vergleichen

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 5

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.Primacy

Firestone Roadhawk vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Firestone Roadhawk vs Uniroyal RainSport 5

Firestone Roadhawk vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Firestone Roadhawk vs Semperit Speed-Life 3

Nach Marke durchsuchen

GT

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Roadhawk

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Abmessungen und Preise

Rankings entdecken

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

Auch vergleichen

Nach Marke durchsuchen

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen