57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
Anzahl der Tests
4
21
18
4
1
14
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#1
#3
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
11.9
6.1
12.0
1.0
5.5
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2024
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
165
47
111
66
700

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
78%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
68%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
89%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
80%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
82%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
85%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
84%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
80%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
59%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
49%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich