57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
4
18
14
5
3
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
6.1
3.6
2.8
3.7
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
47
194
139
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Trockenleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen