58 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Michelin e.Primacy

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Hankook
ION Evo
Michelin
e.Primacy
Anzahl der Tests
4
18
3
1
4
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#1
#1
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
6.1
1.3
1.0
12.0
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
47
23
66
111

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.