57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Dunlop Winter gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Dunlop
Winter
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
4
18
2
3
28
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
6.1
1.5
3.7
2.3
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
40
47
66
36
68

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Dunlop Winter
63%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Dunlop Winter
64%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Dunlop Winter
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen