57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
4
18
21
5
1
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
6.1
11.9
2.8
1.0
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2024
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
47
165
139
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen