57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Fulda EcoControl HP2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Fulda
EcoControl HP2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
4
18
8
13
3
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#4
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
6.1
12.8
4.3
3.7
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2024
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
47
30
123
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
65%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
63%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
62%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
70%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen