57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION FlexClimate gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
4
18
1
4
5
1
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#1
#3
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
6.1
1.0
12.0
2.2
1.0
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2025
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
47
27
111
63
66

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich