57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
4
18
5
14
3
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
6.1
2.8
3.6
3.7
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
47
139
194
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Seitenführung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Trockenleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen