57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Hankook Ventus Prime 4 gegen Michelin e.Primacy

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Michelin
e.Primacy
Anzahl der Tests
4
18
10
14
4
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#2
#2
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
6.1
6.0
6.3
12.0
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
47
109
532
111

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen