57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
4
16
4
1
28
Optimale Position
#2
#3
#3
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
5.5
12.0
1.0
2.3
Neuester Test
2026
2023
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
40
153
111
66
67
Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen