57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Dunlop Winter gegen Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Falken
e.Ziex
Dunlop
Winter
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Anzahl der Tests
4
23
3
2
14
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
3.3
3.7
1.5
3.6
Neuester Test
2026
2025
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
40
176
36
66
194

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Dunlop Winter
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Nassfahrverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dunlop Winter
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Trockenleistung
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
72%
Dunlop Winter
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Innengeräusche
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Dunlop Winter
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen