57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Anzahl der Tests
4
5
10
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
2.8
6.0
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
40
139
109

Nass

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%

Trocken

Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Komfort

Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%

Kosten

Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich