59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
4
10
18
4
8
4
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#1
#3
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
6.0
6.1
12.0
5.0
3.8
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2024
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
40
109
47
111
146
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Falken e.Ziex
56%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
47%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
50%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
43%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
65%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
64%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Kumho Ecsta HS52 Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Michelin e.Primacy Firestone Roadhawk 2 Falken e.Ziex %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.