57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
18
6
13
4
3
Optimale Position
#1
#3
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
4.7
4.3
3.3
3.7
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
123
47
146
123
40
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Kosten
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen