57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin e.Primacy

Testprofil

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Anzahl der Tests
14
4
18
10
4
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#1
#2
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
6.3
3.3
6.1
6.0
12.0
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2024
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
532
40
47
109
111

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Nassbremsen
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Aquaplaning - längs
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Aquaplaning - quer
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Handling - nass
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Kreisbahn nass
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Komfort
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Außengeräusch
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Komfort
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Innengeräusche
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Offroad
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
Trocken
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Trockenbremsen
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Handling - trocken
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Kosten
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Rollwiderstand
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kilometerstand
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen