57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS51 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Kumho
Ecsta HS51
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
10
18
4
13
3
Optimale Position
#1
#1
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
9.3
6.1
3.3
4.3
3.7
Neuester Test
2021
2024
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
99
47
40
123
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS51
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Kumho Ecsta HS51
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Handling - nass
Kumho Ecsta HS51
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - quer
Kumho Ecsta HS51
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Kreisbahn nass
Kumho Ecsta HS51
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Seitenführung
Kumho Ecsta HS51
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Michelin Primacy 4+
70%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Trockenbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS51
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Handling - trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS51
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Kumho Ecsta HS51
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS51
51%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Innengeräusche
Kumho Ecsta HS51
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Kumho Ecsta HS51
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Kilometerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS51
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rollwiderstand
Kumho Ecsta HS51
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen