57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta PS71 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
15
4
4
18
1
Optimale Position
#2
#3
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
9.0
12.0
3.3
6.1
1.0
Neuester Test
2025
2025
2026
2024
2025
Verfügbare Größen
226
111
40
47
66

Nass

Nass
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Handling - nass
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Nassbremsen
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kreisbahn nass
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Trocken

Trocken
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Handling - trocken
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Offroad

Offroad
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%

Komfort

Komfort
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Kosten

Kosten
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometerstand
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Preis-Wert
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich