57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Lassa Competus Winter 2+ gegen Michelin CrossClimate 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Lassa
Competus Winter 2+
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
1
24
4
5
1
Optimale Position
#4
#1
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
4.0
2.7
3.3
2.2
1.0
Neuester Test
2025
2025
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
16
151
40
63
66

Nass

Nass
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
93%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Nassbremsen
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
94%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - quer
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
100%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
89%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
89%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Handling - nass
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
95%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Schnee

Schnee
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Schnee Handling
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
85%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Schneetraktion
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
89%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
90%

Trocken

Trocken
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Handling - trocken
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
86%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Komfort

Komfort
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
76%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Komfort
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
65%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Außengeräusch
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Kosten

Kosten
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich