57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.AT

Vergleich: Michelin CrossClimate 3 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION FlexClimate gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Michelin CrossClimate 3Premium
MichelinMichelin

CrossClimate 3

6.6
R16 – R20
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Hankook ION FlexClimateObere-Mittelklasse
HankookHankook

ION FlexClimate

9.0
R17 – R21
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUVPremium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

9.2
R16 – R22
Auch vergleichen mit
UltraContact NXT Cinturato (C3) PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Michelin
CrossClimate 3
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
2
18
4
1
5
Optimale Position
#7
#1
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
9.0
6.1
3.3
1.0
2.2
Neuester Test
2025
2024
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
67
47
40
27
63

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Michelin CrossClimate 3
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Nassbremsen
Michelin CrossClimate 3
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin CrossClimate 3
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Handling - nass
Michelin CrossClimate 3
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin CrossClimate 3
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin CrossClimate 3
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Schnee
Michelin CrossClimate 3
93%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%
Kosten
Michelin CrossClimate 3
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin CrossClimate 3
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Kilometerstand
Michelin CrossClimate 3
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Trocken
Michelin CrossClimate 3
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin CrossClimate 3
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - trocken
Michelin CrossClimate 3
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Komfort
Michelin CrossClimate 3
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Michelin CrossClimate 3
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Komfort
Michelin CrossClimate 3
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Tread pattern comparison

Michelin CrossClimate 3
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Best snow tyresBest tyres for evsBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

Auch vergleichen

Michelin CrossClimate 3 vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3Michelin CrossClimate 3 vs Continental AllSeasonContact 2Michelin CrossClimate 3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2Michelin CrossClimate 3 vs Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Pirelli Cinturato P7Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.Primacy

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen