57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.AT

Vergleich: Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+Obere-Mittelklasse
KumhoKumho

WinterCraft WP52+

8.7
R13 – R21
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

9.0
R15 – R22
Auch vergleichen mit
PILOT ALPIN 5 SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Anzahl der Tests
4
18
4
3
23
Optimale Position
#3
#1
#2
#4
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
3.3
4.3
3.3
Neuester Test
2025
2024
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
111
47
40
99
176

Nass

Nass
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Nassbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Handling - nass
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%

Trocken

Trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Handling - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Außengeräusch
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Kilometerstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Reifen für ElektroautosBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

Auch vergleichen

Michelin e.Primacy vs Michelin Primacy 5Michelin e.Primacy vs Bridgestone Turanza T005Michelin e.Primacy vs BFGoodrich AdvantageMichelin e.Primacy vs Goodyear Efficient Grip PerformanceGoodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Pirelli Cinturato P7Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliMichelinHankookGoodyearNokianFalkenVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenMaxxisBridgestone

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich