57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Michelin e.Primacy gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Michelin
e.Primacy
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
4
15
18
3
4
Optimale Position
#3
#2
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
9.0
6.1
3.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2025
2025
2024
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
111
226
47
36
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Nassbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Handling - nass
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Seitenführung
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Kosten
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Kilometerstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen