57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Michelin e.Primacy gegen Pirelli P Zero (PZ5) gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Michelin
e.Primacy
Pirelli
P Zero (PZ5)
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
4
3
18
3
4
Optimale Position
#3
#1
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.0
6.1
1.3
3.3
Neuester Test
2025
2026
2024
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
111
17
47
23
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Nassbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Handling - nass
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Seitenführung
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Kosten
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen