57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Michelin Energy Saver + gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Michelin
Energy Saver +
Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
4
4
6
5
Optimale Position
#5
#3
#3
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
10.3
12.0
4.7
2.2
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
111
146
63

Nass

Nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin Energy Saver +
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Kreisbahn nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
95%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Handling - nass
Michelin Energy Saver +
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%

Kosten

Kosten
Michelin Energy Saver +
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin Energy Saver +
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%

Trocken

Trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Handling - trocken
Michelin Energy Saver +
96%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Komfort

Komfort
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Michelin Energy Saver +
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich