57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Michelin
Primacy 5
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
5
6
18
4
3
5
Optimale Position
#1
#3
#1
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
4.8
4.7
6.1
3.3
3.7
2.2
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2024
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
158
146
47
40
36
63

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Nassbremsen
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - längs
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Aquaplaning - quer
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - nass
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Trocken
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Trockenbremsen
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - trocken
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Komfort
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Komfort
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Kosten
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rollwiderstand
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Kilometerstand
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen