58 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Mitas C-16 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Mitas
C-16
Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
21
18
4
14
4
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#2
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
6.1
3.3
5.5
3.8
Neuester Test
2024
2024
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
165
47
40
700
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
65%
Falken e.Ziex
56%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
74%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%
Falken e.Ziex
47%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
87%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
78%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
81%
Falken e.Ziex
90%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
59%
Falken e.Ziex
84%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Mitas C-16 Firestone Roadhawk Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 Falken e.Ziex %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.