58 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Mitas E-09 gegen Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Pirelli P Zero (PZ5) gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Mitas
E-09
Firestone
Multihawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Pirelli
P Zero (PZ5)
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
18
3
4
30
4
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#1
#1
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.3
6.1
3.0
3.8
2.3
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2024
2026
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
8
60
40
47
17
36
68
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)
71%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)
100%
Falken e.Ziex
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)
71%
Falken e.Ziex
47%
Continental PremiumContact 7
83%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)
87%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)
77%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)
73%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
70%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)
84%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)
70%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Mitas E-09 Firestone Multihawk 2 GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Pirelli P Zero (PZ5) Falken e.Ziex Continental PremiumContact 7 GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.