58 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Mitas E-09 gegen Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Testprofil

Mitas
E-09
Firestone
Multihawk 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
18
5
4
30
14
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#1
#1
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
12.0
6.1
2.2
3.3
2.3
5.5
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2024
2025
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
6
60
111
47
63
40
68
700

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
87%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
65%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
83%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
74%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
73%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
70%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
78%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.