58 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Mitas MC50 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Mitas
MC50
Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
21
18
7
4
Optimale Position
#2
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
11.9
6.1
4.4
3.3
Neuester Test
2024
2024
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
11
165
47
158
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Mitas MC50 Firestone Roadhawk Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Michelin Primacy 5 GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.at

LADEN

Reifenlab.at

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.